Der Spiegel has posted a very interesting chart on the cost of reducing excess CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere. I appears that nuclear energy is easily the cheapest method for reducing global warming. What a surprise!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
by Marcel F. Williams Tuscany is renowned for its beautiful cities of Florence and Siena, and is historically famous as the birthplace ... -
by Marcel F. Williams During the Great Depression, the Roosevelt administration decided to create jobs in the US by expanding electric power... -
Links and References Was the Swamp Ape Bipedal? Marine Adaptations in Human Kidneys Morphological Evidence of Marine Adapta...
-
Twin Lunar Regolith Habitats (LRH) on the sintered surface of a lunar outpost. Surrounding walls are composed of aluminum panels that ... -
by Marcel F. Williams Currently, commercial nuclear energy in the US and in the rest of the world is solely utilized for the production of e... -
Two ATHLETE robots joining twin habitat modules together Establishing a permanent and continuously growing human presence on the surface of ... -
New San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie S an Francisco Mayor London Breed has conceded the election to Daniel Lurie. Breed’s failure to adequa... -
The Nuclear Synfuel Economy - April 17, 2009 The Nuplex Solution - February 26, 2009 Synfuels and the Price of Oil - February 19, 2009 The R...
2 comments:
I cannot see the chart in your post in the Der Spiegel article. Do you have a link to the source of the chart?
Der Spiegel's chart is next to the Der Spiegel article at:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,666156-2,00.html
Post a Comment