Der Spiegel has posted a very interesting chart on the cost of reducing excess CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere. I appears that nuclear energy is easily the cheapest method for reducing global warming. What a surprise!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
by Marcel F. Williams Tuscany is renowned for its beautiful cities of Florence and Siena, and is historically famous as the birthplace ... -
Part 1 Part 2 Links and References ULA's Cis-Lunar 1000 Concept Transportation Architecture for Cislunar Space
-
X-Ray of a notional regolith shielded 16 meter in diameter biosphere (Credit: NASA) by Marcel F. Williams A t least 0.1 g is required... -
by Marcel F. Williams Congress has now made it clear that they want the immediate development of a heavy lift vehicle and a crew explorato... -
Links and References Trajectory Optimization for Adaptive Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT) Hypersonic Deployable D...
-
by Marcel F. Williams During the Great Depression, the Roosevelt administration decided to create jobs in the US by expanding electric power... -
Links and References Was the Swamp Ape Bipedal? Marine Adaptations in Human Kidneys Morphological Evidence of Marine Adapta...
-
by Marcel F. Williams During Space Shuttle manager John Shannon's presentation of the Side-mount Shuttle (SD-HLV) concept to the Augu...
2 comments:
I cannot see the chart in your post in the Der Spiegel article. Do you have a link to the source of the chart?
Der Spiegel's chart is next to the Der Spiegel article at:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,666156-2,00.html
Post a Comment