Der Spiegel has posted a very interesting chart on the cost of reducing excess CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere. I appears that nuclear energy is easily the cheapest method for reducing global warming. What a surprise!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
by Marcel F. Williams Tuscany is renowned for its beautiful cities of Florence and Siena, and is historically famous as the birthplace ... -
Siemens Energy's SGT-A35 gas turbine. Credit: Net Zero Technology A t the RWG facility in Aberdeen in ... -
by Marcel F. Williams America has the best hospitals, physicians, nurses, and medical technicians in the world! Unfortunately, the US also... -
by Marcel F. Williams During the Great Depression, the Roosevelt administration decided to create jobs in the US by expanding electric power... -
by Marcel F. Williams Congress has now made it clear that they want the immediate development of a heavy lift vehicle and a crew explorato... -
Links The feasibility and current estimated capital costs of producing jet fuel at sea using carbon dioxide and hydrogen Navy Sc...
-
by Marcel F. Williams On December 17th 1935, the Douglas Aircraft Company introduced an new airplane that revolutionized commercial air trav... -
New San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie S an Francisco Mayor London Breed has conceded the election to Daniel Lurie. Breed’s failure to adequa... -
X-Ray of a notional regolith shielded 16 meter in diameter biosphere (Credit: NASA) by Marcel F. Williams A t least 0.1 g is required...
2 comments:
I cannot see the chart in your post in the Der Spiegel article. Do you have a link to the source of the chart?
Der Spiegel's chart is next to the Der Spiegel article at:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,666156-2,00.html
Post a Comment