Sunday, August 30, 2009
Virgin's Richard Branson on Nuclear Energy
Labels:
nuclear energy,
nuclear power,
Richard Branson,
Virgin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
by Marcel F. Williams Tuscany is renowned for its beautiful cities of Florence and Siena, and is historically famous as the birthplace ...
-
Links and References Was the Swamp Ape Bipedal? Marine Adaptations in Human Kidneys Morphological Evidence of Marine Adapta...
-
Two ATHLETE robots joining twin habitat modules together Establishing a permanent and continuously growing human presence on the surface of ...
-
NASA Selects Companies For Heavy-Lift Launch Vehicle Studies WASHINGTON -- NASA has selected 13 companies for negotiations leading to poten...
-
by Marcel F. Williams During the Great Depression, the Roosevelt administration decided to create jobs in the US by expanding electric power...
-
22 Statistics That Prove The Middle Class Is Being Systematically Wiped Out Of Existence In America Here are the statistics to prove it: • ...
-
by Marcel F. Williams In 2002, Nature magazine announced to the world that French paleontologist, Michel Brunet, and his colleagues had disc...
-
The Nuclear Synfuel Economy - April 17, 2009 The Nuplex Solution - February 26, 2009 Synfuels and the Price of Oil - February 19, 2009 The R...
3 comments:
It surprising to see a man in his position make such claims about oil - his entire business depends on it.
Still, I must take my hat off to him. Nuclear power needs renewed research into waste processing and immediate investment into a new generation of nuclear power plants.
Thanks for sharing this.
The problem with reprocessing spent fuel is that its a lot cheaper for the industry just to pay the Federal government to throw it away rather than reuse if for fuel.
Even though the amount of spent fuel produced by commercial reactors is extremely tiny, permanently storing it is a political problem. IMO, the Federal government needs to reprocess spent fuel and utilize the plutonium and uranium in Federally owned nuclear reactors. Any residual waste should be stored at Federal reactor sites until final deposition a couple of hundred years from now.
The storage of waste is certainly more of a political one than a technological one. The amount of waste produced is so small in comparison with other fuels that it seems odd there should be such an uproar about it.
Granted, the high level waste takes thousands of years to decay to the levels of the original ore, but there are ways and means of dealing with that. The benefits of nuclear power far outweigh this small problem.
Post a Comment