Showing posts with label the Moon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the Moon. Show all posts
Thursday, December 21, 2023
The Peregrine Lunar Mission
Labels:
lunar mission,
NASA,
Peregrine,
robot,
the Moon,
ULA,
Vulcan-Centaur
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Lori Garver Questioned Astronauts about NASA's Next Destination?
In a fascinating oped in the Huffington Post, former astronaut, Clayton Anderson, reports that Lori Garver had a private meeting with the Astronaut Corp. when she was still the Associate Administrator for NASA Spaceflight-- and asked the astronauts what NASA's next destination should be:
"While I was still an astronaut, and an astronaut veteran at that, then Associate Administrator for spaceflight Lori Garver came to speak to the Astronaut Corps. A private meeting, just Ms. Garver and an attentive group of type A personalities, I would venture to guess there were about 40-45 of us "space fliers" seated in the room. A bit of a "rah, rah" meeting, touting NASA's work in the world of commercial spaceflight (and I think commercial spaceflight is a good thing, but that's another op-ed!), she asked us all a significant question.
After some perfunctory remarks, she asked us to raise our hands if "we thought that Mars should be our next destination?" Three astronauts raised their hands.
Next, she offered the question again, but this time replacing the Red Planet with the option of an asteroid as our next destination. No one... that's right, no one, raised a hand.
When she finally asked us about our near-neighbor the moon, every astronaut, save the three that voted for Mars, raised their hands.
I found this interesting. The majority of the astronaut corps, the people that actually do the space flying, agreed with me --that the moon should be our next destination." Clayton Anderson.
You can read the rest of Clayton Anderson's oped at the Huffington Post at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/clayton-anderson/where-do-we-go-from-here_3_b_4495029.html
Marcel F. Williams
More Blogs about Lori Garver:
Where Do We Go From Here?
Report: NASA Astronauts Oppose Obama Asteroid Mission
How Lori Garver misled about '50 year old' Space Launch System Technology
Huntsville-designed Space Launch System should be killed, former NASA No. 2 Lori Garver says
"While I was still an astronaut, and an astronaut veteran at that, then Associate Administrator for spaceflight Lori Garver came to speak to the Astronaut Corps. A private meeting, just Ms. Garver and an attentive group of type A personalities, I would venture to guess there were about 40-45 of us "space fliers" seated in the room. A bit of a "rah, rah" meeting, touting NASA's work in the world of commercial spaceflight (and I think commercial spaceflight is a good thing, but that's another op-ed!), she asked us all a significant question.
After some perfunctory remarks, she asked us to raise our hands if "we thought that Mars should be our next destination?" Three astronauts raised their hands.
Next, she offered the question again, but this time replacing the Red Planet with the option of an asteroid as our next destination. No one... that's right, no one, raised a hand.
When she finally asked us about our near-neighbor the moon, every astronaut, save the three that voted for Mars, raised their hands.
I found this interesting. The majority of the astronaut corps, the people that actually do the space flying, agreed with me --that the moon should be our next destination." Clayton Anderson.
You can read the rest of Clayton Anderson's oped at the Huffington Post at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/clayton-anderson/where-do-we-go-from-here_3_b_4495029.html
Marcel F. Williams
More Blogs about Lori Garver:
Where Do We Go From Here?
Report: NASA Astronauts Oppose Obama Asteroid Mission
How Lori Garver misled about '50 year old' Space Launch System Technology
Huntsville-designed Space Launch System should be killed, former NASA No. 2 Lori Garver says
Labels:
asteroid,
astronauts,
Clayton Anderson,
future of space,
Huffington Post,
Lori Garver,
Mars,
NASA,
SLS,
the Moon
Thursday, October 28, 2010
A Chinese Lunar Scientist's Views on the Future of the Moon
"Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot remain in the cradle forever." , Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1857-1935)
Global Times reporter Yu Jincui interviewed Ouyang Ziyuan (Ouyang), a senior consultant at China's lunar exploration program:
"Strictly speaking, China is a developing country. Some people argue that rather than explore the moon, we should concentrate on dealing with problems on Earth. It is understandable.
However, from a broader development perspective, we should not only be engaged in lunar exploration, but also step up our pace.
The lunar exploration program covers many high-tech fields. It is very scientifically demanding, which stimulates the technological upgrades and innovations.
Lunar exploration is a threshold for exploring deep space and remote space, and it could provide the basic experience for eventually exploring other planets. There are unimaginable abundant natural resources on the moon, such as rare earths, or uranium and titanium ores. The titanium ore reserve on the moon is the same size as the whole of China.
Although we are not able to exploit these resources due to the extremely high cost and technological limitations, as scientists, we have the responsibility to prove the existence of these resources and inform the people.
The moon has a very huge energy reserve. Japanese scientists recently came up with a design idea that if humanity could build a moon belt for solar power generation and transmitting energy back to the earth, human energy needs could be permanently satisfied.
Since the 1990s, a total of nine lunar probes have been launched into space, two from China (including the newly launched Chang'e-2 satellite), three from the US, one from Europe, two from Japan, and one from India.
The world is witnessing the climax of the second round of lunar exploration. All the countries involved are expecting to discover more comprehensive and concrete knowledge about the moon.
If China doesn't explore the moon, we will have no say in international lunar exploration and can't safeguard our proper rights and interests.
The contribution of the Apollo project of the US is amazing. According to one calculation, the input-output ratio is 1:14. It drove the development of high-tech worldwide and made the US a leader in the high-tech field for almost 20 years.
China's lunar exploration program is nowhere near as big as Apollo project in size, but it could also make great contributions in promoting technological improvements, scientific progress and talents cultivation.
China should not stay in the cradle of the Earth forever. The Chinese people should make contributions to the human development in the field of space exploration."
Reference:
China has no desire for new space race

"Strictly speaking, China is a developing country. Some people argue that rather than explore the moon, we should concentrate on dealing with problems on Earth. It is understandable.
However, from a broader development perspective, we should not only be engaged in lunar exploration, but also step up our pace.
The lunar exploration program covers many high-tech fields. It is very scientifically demanding, which stimulates the technological upgrades and innovations.
Lunar exploration is a threshold for exploring deep space and remote space, and it could provide the basic experience for eventually exploring other planets. There are unimaginable abundant natural resources on the moon, such as rare earths, or uranium and titanium ores. The titanium ore reserve on the moon is the same size as the whole of China.
Although we are not able to exploit these resources due to the extremely high cost and technological limitations, as scientists, we have the responsibility to prove the existence of these resources and inform the people.
The moon has a very huge energy reserve. Japanese scientists recently came up with a design idea that if humanity could build a moon belt for solar power generation and transmitting energy back to the earth, human energy needs could be permanently satisfied.
Since the 1990s, a total of nine lunar probes have been launched into space, two from China (including the newly launched Chang'e-2 satellite), three from the US, one from Europe, two from Japan, and one from India.
The world is witnessing the climax of the second round of lunar exploration. All the countries involved are expecting to discover more comprehensive and concrete knowledge about the moon.
If China doesn't explore the moon, we will have no say in international lunar exploration and can't safeguard our proper rights and interests.
The contribution of the Apollo project of the US is amazing. According to one calculation, the input-output ratio is 1:14. It drove the development of high-tech worldwide and made the US a leader in the high-tech field for almost 20 years.
China's lunar exploration program is nowhere near as big as Apollo project in size, but it could also make great contributions in promoting technological improvements, scientific progress and talents cultivation.
China should not stay in the cradle of the Earth forever. The Chinese people should make contributions to the human development in the field of space exploration."
Reference:
China has no desire for new space race
Monday, August 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
by Marcel F. Williams Tuscany is renowned for its beautiful cities of Florence and Siena, and is historically famous as the birthplace ...
-
Links and References Was the Swamp Ape Bipedal? Marine Adaptations in Human Kidneys Morphological Evidence of Marine Adapta...
-
by Marcel F. Williams U kraine will never be truly safe from Russian aggression unless its under the nuclear umbrella of a friendly nation ...
-
Airlander 10 Capacity: 100 passengers Maximum payload: 10 tonnes Cruise speed: 102 km/h Range: 3700 km Service ceiling: 3000 m Links a...
-
Links The feasibility and current estimated capital costs of producing jet fuel at sea using carbon dioxide and hydrogen Navy Sc...
-
Robot Cars - February 6, 2009 The Plug-in Hybrid Revolution - September 17, 2008
-
Was the Swamp Ape Bipedal? November 11, 2013 Evidence of Cerebral Reorganization in the Skull of a Seven Million Year Old Human Ances...