Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(91)
-
▼
November
(14)
- The End of the Shuttle Program
- Dolphins Looking at Their Own Reflections
- Thanksgiving Message from ISS Crew
- So Much for International Cooperation in Space
- A Republican Warns about Climate Change
- Two Retired GM Engineers Test Drive the Chevy Volt
- Chevy Volt Named Motor Trend 2011 Car of the Year
- Energy, Environment, and the US Military
- Doomsday Asteroid
- The TVA Could be the First to Have Mini-Nuclear Po...
- The Moon, Mars, or Asteroids: The Future of Extrat...
- NASA's Next Heavy Lift Vehicle?
- The President's Common Sense Tax Proposal
- TerraPower's New Website
-
▼
November
(14)
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
The Nuclear Synfuel Economy - April 17, 2009 The Nuplex Solution - February 26, 2009 Synfuels and the Price of Oil - February 19, 2009 The R...
-
Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the Moon (Credit: NASA) by Marcel F. Williams I n July of 2016, researchers on the health of NASA astro...
-
by Marcel F. Williams Tuscany is renowned for its beautiful cities of Florence and Siena, and is historically famous as the birthplace ...
-
by Marcel F. Williams Congress has now made it clear that they want the immediate development of a heavy lift vehicle and a crew explorato...
-
Links and References Our Earliest African Ancestor Evidence of Cerebral Reorganization in the Skull of a Seven Million Year Old Huma...
-
by Marcel F. Williams During the Great Depression, the Roosevelt administration decided to create jobs in the US by expanding electric power...
-
Mars and its inner moon, Phobos by Marcel F. Williams T he average woman on Earth is born with an approximately 38% chance of devel...
-
X-Ray of a notional regolith shielded 16 meter in diameter biosphere (Credit: NASA) by Marcel F. Williams A t least 0.1 g is required...
2 comments:
It is not often you see somebody from a political party that has traditionally been opposed to many scientific research conclusions, such as evolution and climate change. However, this is no worse than the other political party in the US that is often represented by people who go ballistic at the very mention of the word "nuclear" in regards to energy.
I myself do not know what to believe when it comes to the matter of climate change. On one hand, the climate of the Earth is rapidly changing, but the Earth's climate has never been constant throughout its geological history. The amount of carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases coming from natural sources such as volcanoes and is immense but at the same time this is not to say that humans are partially responsible.
However, even if it did not have adverse effects on the Earth's climate, continual reliance on fossil fuels leads to a lot of pollution in the form of smog, coal ash, and water contamination in addition to having to rely on regions of the world that are politically unstable for resources.
The Earth hasn't had this much CO2 in the atmosphere in about 15 million years during a time (the Middle Miocene) when there was very little ice in Antarctica and temperatures were about 5 to 10 degrees higher than today.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091008152242.htm
Here's a map of the Earth if we completely melt the ice caps for future generations:
http://newpapyrusmagazine.blogspot.com/2008/03/worse-case-scenario.html
Post a Comment