Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(74)
-
▼
July
(13)
- Wireless Electricity
- A Single Payer Solution: Health Care Credit Cards ...
- A Single Payer Solution: Health Care Credit Cards ...
- The Moon Box
- APOLLO 11
- Terrestrial Energy
- How France Recycles Nuclear Waste
- Recycling Nuclear Waste
- The Amazing E-Rockit
- The Nuclear Waste Fund
- Japan plans to mine uranium from seawater
- Grassoline
- THE PACIFIC
-
▼
July
(13)
CINEMA FANTASTIC
Popular Posts
-
Ocean Nuclear Production of Green Methanol in Remote Japanese Territorial Waters - January 10, 2024 Uranium from Seawater as an Unlimit...
-
A rotating artificial gravity space station in Mars orbit beyond the orbital arc of Deimos. One ETLV-4 crew lander is docked ...
-
Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the Moon (Credit: NASA) by Marcel F. Williams I n July of 2016, researchers on the health of NASA astro...
-
by Marcel F. Williams Congress has now made it clear that they want the immediate development of a heavy lift vehicle and a crew explorato...
-
Computer illustration of Near Rectilinear Orbits between EML1 and EML2 (Credit: NASA). N ASA appears to have settled on a Near Rectil...
-
Links and References The New Glenn Blue Origin
-
SLS launched ETLV-2 at EML1 liquid hydrogen and oxygen fuel depot (ETLV derived) while the MPCV waits to dock with the now fully fueled...
-
by Marcel F. Williams America has the best hospitals, physicians, nurses, and medical technicians in the world! Unfortunately, the US also...
2 comments:
I advocate nuclear power, and I advocate using the unused energy of the U-235, U-238, and Pu-239 in spent fuel. However, the pioneering French recycling leaves much to be desired. Although the waste vitrified radioactive fission products amount to only 3% of the spent fuel, another 76% of the uranium and plutonium of spent fuel is also stored indefinitely. And spent MOX fuel is not reprocessable by the existing French technology.
This is one reason I advocate the "deep burn" capabilities of the liquid fluoride thorium reactor, which retains these heavy metals in the liquid fuel until they eventually fission. Check IEEE for more information at http://spectrum.ieee.org/print/4891
and review the technology and benefits of the liquid fluoride thorium reactor at
http://rethinkingnuclearpower.googlepages.com/aimhigh
I prefer using the reprocessed plutonium in plutonium/thorium powered CANDU reactors. The uranium 233 from the spent fuel from the CANDU reactors could be mixed with the reprocessed uranium 235 from the Light Water Reactors and utilized in other commercial Light Water Reactors.
As far as future thorium burning reactors are concerned, I tend to be a ADS accelerator reactor fan which I will discuss in more detail in the future.
But none of these future fast or breeding technologies are likely to be in commercial operation within 20 years, IMO. It would probably take a decade for the LFTR demo reactor to be finally built and then another decade of testing before its finally approved for commercial use by the NRC and then another 5 to 10 years before the first commercial reactors to be built and actually go online producing power.
That of course doesn't mean that we shouldn't start the process of developing these future reactors right now!
Post a Comment