tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post9089789628287464324..comments2023-10-27T19:34:05.946-07:00Comments on NEW PAPYRUS: Cosmic Radiation and the New Frontier Marcel F. Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16245086958213100840noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post-23123642991763078832020-10-15T12:43:16.417-07:002020-10-15T12:43:16.417-07:00How should we deal with it? We are in the 5G era. ...How should we deal with it? We are in the 5G era. And this technology itself caused <a href="https://emfcare.com/" rel="nofollow">radiation</a> problem.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05486115933446056851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post-19110042022407867812020-10-15T12:41:14.290-07:002020-10-15T12:41:14.290-07:00The percentage is too high! It is almost like 2 in...The percentage is too high! It is almost like 2 in 1 person is likely to develop cancer sometime. That is horrifying.Caleb Rhoadeshttps://emfcare.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post-53563488539688563622014-03-22T08:51:41.138-07:002014-03-22T08:51:41.138-07:00While I'm a strong advocate for Commercial Cre...While I'm a strong advocate for Commercial Crew development, I'm also a strong critic of the ISS. <br /><br />There's really not enough traffic to the ISS from the US side to sustain more than one spaceflight company.<br /><br /> Private space ships should be going to private space stations, IMO. That's the future-- not the ISS. <br /><br />Marcel Marcel F. Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16245086958213100840noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post-23601321621778353062014-03-22T08:48:30.823-07:002014-03-22T08:48:30.823-07:00Artificial gravity would be the best solution for ...Artificial gravity would be the best solution for human interplanetary travel, IMO. Using two habitat modules as counter weights would also give you a back up module in case there are serious malfunctions in the other module. <br /><br />Marcel Marcel F. Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16245086958213100840noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post-72732451609994642932014-03-18T20:34:17.370-07:002014-03-18T20:34:17.370-07:00BTW, you haven't posted yet on the effect of t...BTW, you haven't posted yet on the effect of the Ukrainian issue on space policy, but do you agree we should accelerate commercial crew?<br /> Spudis on his blog usually comments rapidly on issues related to space policy but hasn't mentioned this yet on his blog. He even chose not to publish my comment to his blog that commercial crew should be accelerated.<br /> I get that supporters of the SLS don't like to say anything supportive of commercial space but at this point it should be clear that continued dependence on the Russians for space access is now intolerable.<br /><br /> Bob ClarkRobert Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16114043697010364282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8809438035746342262.post-28137680900316637842014-03-18T20:25:00.707-07:002014-03-18T20:25:00.707-07:00 Nice in depth analysis. However, I still believe ... Nice in depth analysis. However, I still believe the other health effects such as bone and muscle loss and the recently discovered gradual vision loss make shorter flight times preferred.<br /> In fact, I think we already have the technical means for such short flight times:<br /><br />Short travel times to Mars now possible through plasma propulsion.<br />http://exoscientist.blogspot.com/2014/03/short-travel-times-to-mars-now-possible.html<br /><br /> Bob ClarkRobert Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16114043697010364282noreply@blogger.com